The free market economy is when there are intentional interactions that take place in a prearranged financially viable atmosphere. Such markets are branded by a spur-of-the-moment as well as a decentralized command of engagements through which persons formulate financial verdicts. The nature of a free market is solely dependent on the political and officially authorized set of laws set by a nation and they may be assortment of very huge as well as extremely black markets. The free market is associated with laissez-faire economics, socialist, geoist and non-laissez-faire economics (Piketty, 2015); (Harvard University).
The principle governing laissez-faire articulates a first choice for a nonappearance of non-market demands on earnings and consequences, for instance those from prejudiced regime monies, financial assistance, excise, and convention of solely undisclosed manners or coercive cartels. Marxism economic structure comprises collective possession alongside self-governing rule of the way of manufacture which may signify sovereign accommodating or unswerving unrestricted rights and production is done for nonstop usage by the community.

You're lucky! Use promo "samples20"
and get a custom paper on
"Economic Principles of Free Markets"
with 20% discount!
Order Now

The markets with the smallest amounts of uncertainty have a propensity with nation states that give importance to personal possessions, free enterprise in addition to entity privileges. This is sensible in view of the fact that biased classifications that are timid when it comes to regulations for human being conduct unavoidably hamper less with unpaid financial dealings. Free markets are known to thrive more in arrangements where chattels constitutional rights are well sheltered and consumerists have an enticement to trail proceeds. Property rights are important for the growth and development of every economy hence should never be ignored or undermined (Lodge, 2008).

Managing Market Failure
In money matters, marketplace malfunction is a situation whereby the distribution of merchandise along with services is not efficient enough. This means, there is an alternative possible result where a person may be made more privileged without depriving others of their rights. Market failure is a wide topic and with the recent discoveries, there seem to be more than just one type. The first form of marketplace malfunction is directly related to externalities in the capitalist course of action of determining new-fangled money-spinning savings prospects (Hausmann and Rodrik, 2002), with the second being the one allied to synchronization disappointment in captivating the indispensable performances to amplify sector-wide production.

It is the responsibility of the economists to conduct analyses on the causes of market failure and the possible remedies that could be implemented at any given time. The following are some of the ways through which market failure can be solved:

Controlling monopoly powers: This can be done through the government when they create anti-monopoly laws and formulate legislation that is restrictive towards deal practices. The main goal for creating such laws is because they are to do away with unmerited rivalry, put off iniquitous fee favouritism in addition to fixing prices to the required levels. The government can also make this possible by introducing strict regulations along with better taxation policies. This is to enable most upcoming companies to establish themselves.
Externalities: The government has the authority interfere in each and every case of exterior diseconomies of fabrication to take out the disagreement connecting concealed and public expenses and remuneration. As for external diseconomies of utilization, the nation can come up with ways of eliminating the usage of polluting items. Alongside these, there can also be provision of incentives promoting the production of facilities with positive effects to most individuals; this is bound to help the end users maximize the fulfilment they get from a particular commodity thereby making them consume it more and more.

Increasing returns to scale: This is one of the tricky solutions to implement as different individuals have contradicting opinions concerning it. A number of economists preach that the regime should make public such manufacturing companies which function underneath diminishing price tags and show the way to more than the usual invention. Some on the other hand do not consent to it on the grounds that they believe that the management control would make circumstances worse than they already are. However, others are of the opinion that classified firms should manufacture goods as the administration enforces charge directives and strain them so that the community as well as private costs and benefits are equal.

Implementation of Property rights: The slack by the government in implementing property rights is one of the main causes of market failure. So, when the management comes up with ways of smoothly putting into operation these laws, things would change for the better.

Trade and industry emancipation is the capability of the general public to embark on money-making activities without any pressure from external forces. Achieving economic freedom is not an easy endeavour. There are a variety of factors that have to be considered. One of those is the conventional noninterventionist and open-minded customs that emphasize the importance of liberated markets, trade and the acquisition of private property under open enterprise. The other ideas linked to economic freedom are freedom from want and the freedom to engage in collective bargaining.

There are various views when it comes to enabling and allowing people to pursue their own economic interests. When people are allowed to pursue their interests, it means they are free to earn a living in whatever way they chose to handle their businesses as long as they are not breaking any laws at any given time. The fact that freedom to operate independently as individuals in the world of business is the main reason why there are restricted and decentralized administrations. The most significant advantage linked to economic liberty is the fact that it improves economic growth rates within a nation. Economic freedom also leads to an increase in capital held by individuals. This can be good or bad depending on which angle one looks at it from.

    References
  • Baumol, W.J. and Blinder, A.S., 2015. Microeconomics: Principles and policy. Cengage Learning.
  • Bleda, M. and Del Rio, P., 2013. The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems. Research policy, 42(5), pp.1039-1052.
  • Dunleavy, P., 2014. Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice: economic approaches in political science. Routledge.
  • Hausmann, R. and D. Rodrik, 2002: “Economic Development as Self-Discovery,” NBER
    Working Paper No. 8952.
  • Madhok, A., 2015. Market Failure, Relational Failure and the Nature of Advantage: Examining the Competitiveness of Multinational Enterprises. Browser Download This Paper.
  • Lodge M. (2008) Regulation, the Regulatory State and European Politics,
  • West European Politics
  • Miller, T., Kim, A.B. and Holmes, K., 2015. 2015 Index of economic Freedom. Washington DC: The Heritage Foundation.
  • Miyagawa, T. ed., 2015. Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance. Springer.
  • O’brien, R. and Williams, M., 2016. Global political economy: Evolution and dynamics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Piketty, T. and Ganser, L.J., 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century.
  • Piketty, T. 2015. The Economics of Inequality.
  • Piketty, T., Sachs, J., Flassbeck, H., Rodrik, D. and Wren-Lewis, S., 2015. Austerity has failed: An open letter from Thomas Piketty to Angela Merkel. The Nation.
  • Prasad, M., 2006. The politics of free markets: The rise of neoliberal economic policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States. University of Chicago Press.
  • Rodrik, D., 2014. When ideas trump interests: Preferences, worldviews, and policy innovations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), pp.189-208.
  • Rodrik, D., 2015. When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations. VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, 1.
  • Röpke, W., 2014. A humane economy: the social framework of the free market. Open Road Media.
  • Stenberg, K., Axelson, H., Sheehan, P., Anderson, I., Gülmezoglu, A.M., Temmerman, M., Mason, E., Friedman, H.S., Bhutta, Z.A., Lawn, J.E. and Sweeny, K., 2014. Study Group for the Global Investment Framework for Women’s and Children’s Health. Advancing social and economic development by investing in women’s and children’s health: a new Global Investment Framework. Lancet, 383(9925), pp.1333-54.
  • Stiglitz, J.E., 2010. Freefall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. WW Norton & Company.
  • Sundararajan, A., 2014. Peer-to-peer businesses and the sharing (collaborative) economy: Overview, economic effects and regulatory issues. Written testimony for the hearing titled The Power of Connection: Peer to Peer Businesses, January.
  • Teece, D.J., 2015. Intangibles, Market Failure and Innovation Performance. New York: Springer.
  • Tily, G., 2016. Keynes’s General Theory, the Rate of Interest and Keynesian’Economics. Springer.
  • Vogelsang, I., 2014. Government Failure: Society, Markets and Rules. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), pp.543-545.
  • Young, M.N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S. and Ahlstrom, D., 2014. Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2), pp.331-354.